Preferences for disclosure: the case of bedside rationing
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 59 (9) , 1891-1897
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.023
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical and lay preferences for the explicit prioritisation of elective waiting lists: survey evidence from WalesHealth Policy, 2002
- Why is less money spent on health care for the elderly than for the rest of the population? Health care rationing in German hospitalsSocial Science & Medicine, 2002
- Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative carePalliative Medicine, 2002
- “If there were a war tomorrow, we’d find the money”: contrasting perspectives on the rationing of health careSocial Science & Medicine, 2002
- Who wants to know if their care is rationed? Views of citizens and service informantsHealth Expectations, 2001
- Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centresBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Truth or ConsequencesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The rationing debate: Rationing within the NHS should be explicit: The case forBMJ, 1997
- The case againstBMJ, 1997
- The Doctor's Changing Role in Allocating U.S. and British Medical ServicesLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1990