Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias
- 24 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 25 (22) , 3769-3786
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2494
Abstract
In the case in which all subjects are screened using a common test and only a subset of these subjects are tested using a golden standard test, it is well documented that there is a risk for bias, called verification bias. When the test has only two levels (e.g. positive and negative) and we are trying to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the test, we are actually constructing a confidence interval for a binomial proportion. Since it is well documented that this estimation is not trivial even with complete data, we adopt multiple imputation framework for verification bias problem. We propose several imputation procedures for this problem and compare different methods of estimation. We show that our imputation methods are better than the existing methods with regard to nominal coverage and confidence interval length. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial ProportionsThe American Statistician, 1998
- The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal RulesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Multiple Imputation after 18+ YearsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification biasCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1993
- Asymptotic Results for Multiple ImputationThe Annals of Statistics, 1988
- The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data AugmentationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Logit-Based Interval Estimation for Binomial Data Using the Jeffreys PriorSociological Methodology, 1987
- Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable NonresponseJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1986
- Assessment of Diagnostic TechnologiesInvestigative Radiology, 1985