Dielectric Strength Ratio Between Alternating and Direct Voltages

Abstract
High-Voltage insulation testing has been and is usually still done by alternating voltages. High direct voltage was made available for testing purposes by the development of the kenotron tube. When used for testing insulation direct voltage has several advantages over alternating voltage. (1) the power necessary is often much less with direct voltage than with alternating voltage. In apparatus of high electrostatic capacity, such as long high-voltage cables, the size of the alternating-voltage testing transformer becomes excessive, thousands of kilovolt-amperes being necessary. Direct voltages are therefore preferable as they necessitate only a few kilowatts. (2) Excess direct voltage is less likely to permanently damage the insulation than excess alternating voltage. (3) If direct voltage is used conductivity tests can be made and the action of the material on the application of the voltage more thoroughly studied. As the use of high direct voltage for testing purposes is found to be increasing, it is important to determine the relation between the insulation stress produced by direct and that produced by alternating voltages. Little is definitely known of what is called the ``dielectric strength ratio of insulation'' which is the ratio of the direct disruptive voltage to the crest value of the alternating disruptive voltage. In general, this ratio might be expected to be unity. While such is the case with air some engineers have claimed, however, that some solid insulations stand a higher direct than alternating voltage.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: