Comparison of three measures for detecting psychological disturbance in patients with low back pain
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 13 (3) , 299-305
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(82)90019-7
Abstract
The MMPI [Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory] Low Back Scale, the Conversion V MMPI profile and the Back Pain Classification Scale were compared for accuracy in detecting psychological disturbance in a sample of 91 patients with low back pain. These patients were classified as to the presence or absence of organic findings and psychological disturbance on the basis of objective and independent evaluations. Hit rates of 37.4, 64.5 and 78.0% were produced by the 3 measures, respectively. The Back Pain Classification Scale was the most accurate measure, and the only scale to exceed base rate. The implications of these findings for clinical practice are discussed.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychological disturbance and pain report differences in both organic and non-organic low back pain patientsPain, 1979
- Low back pain in patients with and without demonstrable organic diseasePain, 1979
- Validity of a back pain classification scale among patients with low back pain not associated with demonstrable organic diseaseJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1979
- The detection of psychological disturbance in patients with low back painJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1979
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Personality Factors in Chronic Low Back PainClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1977
- The use of the MMPI with chronic low back pain patients with a mixed diagnosisJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1976
- The use of the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory with low back pain patientsJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1976
- Industrial Injuries of the Back and ExtremitiesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1972
- Psychologic Factors in Low-Back PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1954
- MMPI profiles in patients with low-back pain.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1951