Comparison of Weight Loss After Gastric Exclusion and Partitioning
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 118 (6) , 685-692
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390060007002
Abstract
• We report follow-up findings after two to almost four years on 100 patients who were described in a previously published prospective randomized series. Horizontally stapled gastric partition (gastroplasty) was compared with gastric exclusion (bypass) using a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. An additional 142 patients had the identical operative procedures performed during the same time period, but chose their own operation. Both procedures used a small gastric pouch (15 mL) and calibrated 10-mm opening. Weight loss was better after exclusion and has continued to be better. Patients who lose weight well do not regain. There were complications in 8% of the exclusion patients and 12% of the partitioning patients and one death in the exclusion group—0.4% of the total group. Since gastric exclusion is safe and produces significantly better weight loss, we believe it sets the current standard against which all other bariatric surgery must be compared. (Arch Surg 1983;118:685-692)Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gastroplasty in the surgical treatment of morbid obesityThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1980
- Definition and Health Consequences of Morbid ObesitySurgical Clinics of North America, 1979
- Obesity: adverse effects on health and longevityThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1979
- A Prospective Comparison of Gastric and Jejunoileal Bypass Procedures for Morbid ObesityAnnals of Surgery, 1977
- Gastric Bypass in ObesitySurgical Clinics of North America, 1967