Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology
- 18 October 2005
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Vol. 62 (11) , 750-760
- https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.013102
Abstract
Background: It has been speculated on theoretical grounds that biomarkers are superior surrogates for chemical exposures to air samples in epidemiology studies. Methods and Results: Biomarkers were classified according to their position in the exposure-disease continuum—that is, parent compound, reactive intermediate, stable metabolite, macromolecular adduct, or measure of cellular damage. Because airborne exposures and these different biomarkers are time series that vary within and between persons in a population, they are all prone to measurement error effects when used as surrogates for true chemical exposures. It was shown that the attenuation bias in the estimated slope characterising a log exposure-log disease relation should decrease as the within- to between-person variance ratio of a given set of air or biomarker measurements decreases. To gauge the magnitudes of these variance ratios, a database of 12 077 repeated observations was constructed from 127 datasets, including air and biological measurements from either occupational or environmental settings. The within- and between-person variance components (in log scale, after controlling for fixed effects of time) and the corresponding variance ratios for each set of air and biomarker measurements were estimated. It was shown that estimated variance ratios of biomarkers decreased in the order short term (residence time ⩽2 days) > intermediate term (2 days < residence time ⩽2 months) > long term biomarkers (residence time >2 months). Overall, biomarkers had smaller variance ratios than air measurements, particularly in environmental settings. This suggests that a typical biomarker would provide a less biasing surrogate for exposure than would a typical air measurement. Conclusion: Epidemiologists are encouraged to consider the magnitudes of variance ratios, along with other factors related to practicality and cost, in choosing among candidate surrogate measures of exposure.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- CommentaryThe Beginning of the Science Underpinning Occupational HygieneAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2003
- Individual-based and group-based occupational exposure assessment: Some equations to evaluate different strategiesAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 1998
- Monitoring of occupational exposure to cytostatic anticancer agentsMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1996
- An Investigation of Systematic Changes in Occupational ExposureAihaj Journal, 1996
- Biological effect monitoring in industrial workers following incidental exposure to high concentrations of ethylene oxideMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1995
- Biological monitoring and standard setting in the USA: a critical appraisalToxicology Letters, 1995
- The relationship between environmental monitoring and biological markers in exposure assessment.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1995
- Effect of activated oxygen species in human lymphocytesMutation Research/DNA Repair, 1995
- 32P-Post-labeling detection of DNA adducts in mononuclear cells of workers occupationally exposed to styreneCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1994
- Application of mathematical modelling for assessing the biological half-times of chromium and nickel in field studies.Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1980