The impact of heterogeneity on the comparison of survival times
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 6 (7) , 773-784
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060708
Abstract
We consider several sources of heterogeneity in a clinical trial with patients' survival time as the main response criterion: differences in prognosis which can be attributed to a latent or ignored prognostic factor; differences in treatment efficacy in subgroups of patients, and differences in treatment combinations received by the patients. The impact of these types of heterogeneity on the treatment comparison is studied assuming a proportional hazards model. It is measured by the size and power of the logrank and proportional hazards score tests and by the bias of the estimated treatment effect. We show that heterogeneity can seriously affect the treatment comparison and has to be considered during the planning stage as well as at the analysis of a clinical trial.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A simple test of the proportional hazards assumptionBiometrika, 1987
- Assessment of stratum‐covariate interactions in Cox's proportional hazards regression modelStatistics in Medicine, 1986
- Models of Independent Action for Combination TherapyBiometrical Journal, 1985
- Effect of misspecification of regression models in the analysis of survival dataBiometrika, 1984
- Interactive effects of mixtures of stimuli in life table analysisBiometrika, 1983
- Long-term effects of interventions to improve survival in mixed populationsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1980