Assessment of the Vascularization of Neuroendocrine Tumors by Stimulated Acoustic Emission of SH U 508A Ultrasound Contrast Agent and Color or Power Doppler Sonography
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 35 (4) , 253-259
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200004000-00006
Abstract
Ricke J, Lopez Hänninen E, Amthauer H, Lemke A, Felix R.Assessment of the vascularization of neuroendocrine tumors by stimulated acoustic emission of SH U 508A ultrasound contrast agent and color or power Doppler sonography. Invest Radiol 2000;35:253–259. To assess the vascularization of neuroendocrine tumors by stimulated acoustic emission (SAE) of SH U 508A during the blood pool phase in comparison with contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography. Thirty-six patients with neuroendocrine tumors received contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography and 21, an additional SAE. To classify tumor perfusion on Doppler sonography, a 4-step rating score was introduced: (1) no vessels (hypoperfusion); (2) one feeding or central vessel (hypoperfusion); (3) some vessels (hyperperfusion); and (4) disseminated vessels (hyperperfusion). In 36 patients, 1 pancreatic primary tumor, 33 liver metastases, 1 splenic metastasis, and 1 lymph node metastasis were examined. Results were correlated with biphasic spiral CT (n = 35) and angiography (n = 2). Arterial-phase CT and digital subtraction angiography revealed 18 hyper- and 18 hypoperfused lesions. Contrast-enhanced Doppler correctly classified 15 of 18 patients (83%) with hyperperfused lesions as well as 16 of 18 (89%) hypoperfused tumors by applying the rating score. SAE correctly identified 4 of 9 hyperperfused lesions (44%), 2 were isoperfused compared with normal liver tissue (22%), and 3 were hypoperfused (33%). Of 12 hypoperfused lesions, 11 were classified correctly (92%), and 1 showed isoperfusion. Hence, the positive and negative predictive values for SAE were 80% and 69%, respectively. For contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography, positive and negative predictive values were 88% and 84%, respectively. Blood pool SAE failed to determine subtle tumor perfusion correctly. The rating score for contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography characterized tumor perfusion with high accuracy. The use of a contrast agent significantly improved perfusion characterization.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agentThe Lancet, 1999
- D-Galactose-Based Signal-Enhanced Color Doppler Sonography of Breast Tumors and Tumorlike LesionsInvestigative Radiology, 1999
- Improved Imaging of Liver Metastases with Stimulated Acoustic Emission in the Late Phase of Enhancement with the US Contrast Agent SH U 508A: Early ExperienceRadiology, 1999
- Ultrasound contrast agentsEuropean Journal of Radiology, 1998
- Assessment of Vascularity in Reactive Lymph Nodes by Means of D-Galactose Contrast-Enhanced Doppler SonographyInvestigative Radiology, 1998
- Clinical applications of ultrasound contrast agentsUltrasonics, 1998
- Delineation of Experimental Liver Tumors in Rabbits by a New Ultrasound Contrast Agent and Stimulated Acoustic EmissionInvestigative Radiology, 1997
- Carcinoid Tumors: Imaging Procedures and Interventional RadiologyWorld Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Hepatic arterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases of endocrine tumors a prospective phase II study in 24 patientsCancer, 1993
- Angiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Detection of Liver Metastases from Endocrine Gastrointestinal TumoursActa Radiologica, 1987