Neurostimulation treatment for angina pectoris
Open Access
- 1 February 2000
- Vol. 83 (2) , 217-220
- https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.83.2.217
Abstract
Despite the wealth of treatments available for the management of angina pectoris, a significant proportion of patients remain refractory. These patients seem to be survivors, so that an individual with refractory angina may suffer with it for many years; consequently patients with refractory angina pectoris usually require multiple admissions, often to expensive cardiac units.1 Recently transmyocardial laser revascularisation (TMLR) has enjoyed considerable world wide popularity as a potential treatment strategy. However, the recently published TMLR trial from Papworth Hospital led the investigators to conclude that they cannot advocate the adoption of TMLR for the management of refractory angina.2 Neurostimulation presents an alternative treatment strategy for which efficacy data continues to grow, although there has not yet been a large randomised controlled trial into its use in the treatment of refractory angina. This article summarises neurostimulation research to date and reviews the current theories on the mechanisms of action. Neurostimulation was developed in response to the gate theory of pain transmission to provide a non-pharmacological method of providing pain relief.3 Despite initial excitement, the effects were found to be variable. In the case of peripheral vascular disease, neurostimulation in the form of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was found to be particularly useful.4 As well as providing pain relief, neurostimulation also improved microcirculatory blood flow, and led to ischaemic ulcer healing. In response to the work in peripheral vascular disease, other workers began to look for a similar effect in different ischaemic conditions, with Mannheimer and colleagues first reporting the success of TENS in patients with chronic intractable angina pectoris.5 They showed that TENS not only reduced patients' symptoms, but also increased the myocardium's threshold for ischaemia.6 The technique was applied clinically only in patients where medical and surgical treatment …Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectorisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on autonomic cardiovascular reflexesClinical Autonomic Research, 1995
- Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant therapy for intractable angina pectoris: A prospective, randomized clinical studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action.BMJ, 1993
- Effect of spinal cord stimulation on regional myocardial perfusion assessed by positron emission tomographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Catecholamine metabolism during pacing-induced angina pectoris and the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Dorsal column stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectorisPain, 1987
- Does placebo improve indexes of effort-induced myocardial ischemia? An objective study in 150 patients with chronic stable angina pectorisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with severe angina pectoris.Circulation, 1985
- Effect of physical training on treadmill exercise capacity, collateral circulation and progression of coronary diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974