Enzyme–biomaterial interactions: Effect of biosystems on degradation of polyurethanes
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Vol. 27 (1) , 97-109
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270113
Abstract
Enzyme‐induced liberation of hard‐segment‐containing components from polyurethanes was evaluated using two 14C‐labeled polyurethanes. A polyester ureaurethane and polyether urea‐urethane were synthesized from toluene‐2,4‐diisocyanate (TDI)/ polycaprolactone diol (PCL) or TDI/polyethylene glycol (PEO) with 14C‐labeled ethylene diamine. Both materials were characterized using electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), size exclusion chromotography, and material chemistry by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Biodegradation assays were carried out using cholesterol esterase (CE), collagenase (CO), cathepsin B (CB), and xanthine oxidase (XO) at the pH optimum conditions for each enzyme at 37°C. Biodegradation was analyzed by monitoring the release of radiolabel, by weight change, and by surface analysis using scanning electron microscopy. The polyester urea‐urethane was shown to be susceptible to enzymatic degradation above the effect of the buffer control solution by the CE but not by the other enzyme systems as monitored by radiolabel released. In the initial period of incubation, the rate of degradation was increased for all systems, including buffer controls; however, the rates dropped off rapidly by day 28. The change in weight data for the polyester urea‐urethane and polyether urea‐urethane showed no enzyme‐dependent biodegradation above the buffer controls. However, in sodium acetate buffer at pH = 5, the polymers showed a significant weight loss relative to other buffers. In conclusion, this study showed that the biological component responsible for the onset of the biodegradation process is more likely the result of a multitude of biologically mediated compounds acting synergistically, with the process being enhanceds by physical parameters such as material dissolution. In addition characterization of surface and bulk chemistry as well as material structure evaluation have been shown to be essential to interpret degradation data. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of sulfonation of segmented polyurethanes on the transient adsorption of fibrinogen from plasma: Possible correlation with anticoagulant behaviorJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1992
- An Assessment of 2,4 TDA Formation from Surgitek Polyurethane Foam under Simulated Physiological ConditionsJournal of Biomaterials Applications, 1991
- Analysis of in vitro enzymatic and oxidative degradation of polyurethanesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1988
- Long term biodegradation in vitro of poly(ether urethane urea): a mechanical property studyPolymer, 1987
- The enzymatic degradation of polymers in vitroJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1987
- Biomaterials in Artificial OrgansChemical & Engineering News, 1986
- Property changes of UHMW polyethylene hip cup endoprostheses during implantationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1984
- Porcine cholesterol esterase, a multiform enzymeBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1983
- Biodegradable polymers: Chymotrypsin degradation of a low molecular weight poly(ester‐urea) containing phenylalanineJournal of Applied Polymer Science, 1979
- An evaluation of a polyurethane for use as a medical grade plasticToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1978