Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison
Open Access
- 1 November 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing Research
- Vol. 21 (4) , 456-462
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378402100410
Abstract
Though the use of conjoint analysis has increased substantially in recent years, relatively little empirical evidence has been published on how its reliability and validity compares with that of alternative methodological approaches. The authors report the results of a study designed to compare the test-retest reliability and predictive validity of several alternative conjoint analysis techniques with that of self-explicated weights under the condition of all attributes being dichotomous. The findings fail to demonstrate greater reliability and validity for the conjoint analysis techniques considered.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A SurveyJournal of Marketing, 1982
- A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 1981
- Conjoint Measurement: Temporal Stability and Structural ReliabilityJournal of Marketing Research, 1979
- Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and OutlookJournal of Consumer Research, 1978
- A Consumer Preference Approach to the Planning of Rural Primary Health-Care FacilitiesOperations Research, 1976
- Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer ValuesJournal of Marketing Research, 1974
- Forecasting Traffic on STOL*Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1973
- Subjective evaluation models and conjoint measurementBehavioral Science, 1972
- Using Laboratory Brand Preference Scales to Predict Consumer Brand PurchasesManagement Science, 1971
- Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity.American Psychologist, 1960