What Hides Behind an Unemployment Rate: Comparing Portuguese and U.S. Labor Markets
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 91 (1) , 187-207
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.187
Abstract
Behind similar unemployment rates in the United States and Portugal hide two very different labor markets. Unemployment duration is three times longer in Portugal than in the United States. Symmetrically, flows of workers into unemployment are three times lower in Portugal. These lower flows come in roughly equal proportions from lower job creation and destruction, and from lower worker flows given job creation and destruction. A plausible explanation is high employment protection in Portugal. High employment protection makes economies more sclerotic; but because it affects unemployment duration and worker flows in opposite directions, the effect on unemployment is ambiguous. (JEL E2, J3, J6)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Job security, employment and wagesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: the Aggregate EvidenceThe Economic Journal, 2000
- Enforcement of employment security regulations, on-the-job search and unemployment durationEuropean Economic Review, 1999
- Trend Employment Growth and the Bunching of Job Creation and DestructionThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe versus North AmericaJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1997
- Labor-market flexibility and aggregate employment volatilityCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1997
- Institutions and labor reallocationEuropean Economic Review, 1997
- Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of UnemploymentThe Review of Economic Studies, 1994
- Job Security Provisions and EmploymentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990
- The Cyclical Behavior of the Gross Flows of U.S. WorkersBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1990