Cervical‐cancer screening: Attendance and cost‐effectiveness
- 15 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 45 (3) , 410-415
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910450305
Abstract
The influence of attendance on the health effects and cost‐effectiveness of cervical‐cancer screening was studied, both for organized screening programmes and for spontaneous screening. The asymmetric distribution of smears among the female population and the higher risk incurred by women who never or only occasionally attend screening appear crucial in determining the health effects of screening. An increase in attendance rate induces a substantial rise in health effects and a less than proportionate rise in costs, thus improving cost‐effectiveness. Wider screening coverage, in order to increase the number of life‐years saved, is achieved more efficiently by encouraging a greater number of women to attend than by inviting the same number of women to attend more often, i.e., with a shorter interval between successive screens. Spontaneous screening is characterized by high coverage for younger women and low coverage for middle‐aged and older women. This leads to a small amount of health effects and poor cost‐effectiveness as compared with organized screening.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia, 1955-85BMJ, 1988
- Computer-managed cervical cytology screening: A pilot study of non-attendersPublic Health, 1987
- A computer-managed call and recall system for cervical screeningPublic Health, 1986
- Mass Screening in Sweden for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: Effect on Incidence and MortalityGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 1986
- Evaluation of screening programmes for gynaecological cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1985
- The MISCAN simulation program for the evaluation of screening for diseaseComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 1985
- Attendance for cervical screening—Whose problem?Social Science & Medicine, 1985
- Screening for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix in Iceland 1965–1978Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1982
- The Cardiff cervical cytology study. Enumeration and definition of population and initial acceptance rates.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1980
- Response to a mobile cervical screening unit in an industrial area of EnglandPublic Health, 1976