Adherence–resistance relationships for protease and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors explained by virological fitness
Top Cited Papers
- 9 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 20 (2) , 223-231
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000199825.34241.49
Abstract
Objective: To compare the prevalence of resistance by adherence level in patients treated with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) or protease inhibitors (PI). Also to examine the mechanism of differential class-specific adherence–resistance relationships, focusing on the patient-derived capacity of wild-type and drug-resistant recombinant variants to replicate in vitro in the presence of variable drug levels. Methods: Participants received unannounced pill count measures to assess adherence, viral load monitoring, and genotypic resistance testing. The replicative capacity of drug-susceptible and drug-resistant recombinants was determined using a single-cycle recombinant phenotypic susceptibility assay. Drug exposure was estimated using population-averaged pharmacological measurements adjusted by participant-specific levels of adherence. Results: In the NNRTI-treated group, 69% had resistance at 0–48% adherence compared to 13% at 95–100% (P = 0.01). PI resistance was less common than NNRTI resistance at 0–48% adherence (69% versus 23%; P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the odds for PI resistance increased (P = 0.03) while the odds for NNRTI resistance decreased (P = 0.04) with improving adherence. Individuals with drug-resistant variants were more likely to have levels of drug exposure where the resistant variant was more fit than the drug-susceptible variant in vitro, while those with drug-susceptible virus were more likely to have levels of drug exposure where the drug-susceptible virus was more fit than the drug-resistant variant (P = 0.005). Conclusions: NNRTI resistance was more common than PI resistance at low levels of adherence. Class-specific adherence–resistance relationships are associated with the relative replicative capacity of drug-resistant versus wild-type variants to replicate in the presence of clinically relevant drug levels.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- High levels of adherence do not prevent accumulation of HIV drug resistance mutationsAIDS, 2003
- Virologic Rebound on HAART in the Context of Low Treatment Adherence Is Associated With a Low Prevalence of Antiretroviral Drug ResistanceJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2002
- Intermittent use of triple-combination therapy is predictive of mortality at baseline and after 1 year of follow-upAIDS, 2002
- Impact of Adherence and Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on Survival in HIV-Infected PatientsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2002
- Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Viral Suppression in HIV‐Infected Drug Users: Comparison of Self‐Report and Electronic MonitoringClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Non-adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy predicts progression to AIDSAIDS, 2001
- Adherence to Protease Inhibitor Therapy and Outcomes in Patients with HIV InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Adherence to protease inhibitors, HIV-1 viral load, and development of drug resistance in an indigent populationAIDS, 2000
- Public Health Implications of Antiretroviral Therapy and HIV Drug ResistanceJAMA, 1998
- Drug-Resistant HIV-1Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998