Short-term effects of topical fusidic acid or mupirocin on the prevalence of fusidic acid resistant (FusR)Staphylococcus aureusin atopic eczema
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 148 (5) , 1010-1017
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05292.x
Abstract
Background Staphylococcus aureus has a role in the pathophysiology of atopic eczema. Topical fusidic acid is widely used in its treatment. There is concern that topical use of fusidic acid may be driving the selection and dissemination of fusidic acid‐resistant (FusR) S. aureus. Objectives To test the hypothesis that treatment of atopic eczema for 2 weeks with topical fusidic acid/steroid combination can increase carriage of FusRS. aureus. Methods Forty‐six patients with atopic eczema were allocated randomly to one of two treatment groups. Group 1 (28 patients) were treated with topical 2% fusidic acid plus 0·1% betamethasone cream, and group 2 (18 patients) with topical 2% mupirocin and 0·1% betamethasone cream. The clinical response and nasal and skin colonization with S. aureus were recorded before treatment and after 1 and 2 weeks of therapy. Results Baseline samples from the site of worst eczema showed S. aureus (sensitive and resistant) in 76% of patients, and FusRS. aureus in 26%, with no significant difference between treatment groups. After 1 and 2 weeks, both groups showed similar significant clinical improvement. The overall median clinical improvement was paralleled by a reduction in prevalence and population density of S. aureus (sensitive and resistant) at the worst eczema site (P < 0.0001). However, for FusRS. aureus there was no significant change in the prevalence of carriage, or population density in either group compared to baseline. Over 50% of patients carried S. aureus in the nerves and over 20% carried FusRS. aureus. Neither regimen affected either the prevalence or population density of S. aureus or FusRS. aureus in the nerves. Conclusions In this small study there is no evidence to support the hypothesis that short‐term treatment of atopic eczema with fusidic acid/steroid combination increases fusidic acid resistant S. aureus during a 2‐week period.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The significance of nasal carriage ofStaphylococcus aureusas risk factor for human skin infectionsFEMS Microbiology Letters, 2001
- Mutation frequencies for resistance to fusidic acid and rifampicin in Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2001
- Nasal Carriage as a Source ofStaphylococcus aureusBacteremiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Observations on high levels of fusidic acid resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UKClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 2000
- S. aureus isolation from the lesions, the hands, and the anterior nares of patients with atopic dermatitis.Pediatric Dermatology, 1998
- Bacterial Resistance in AcneDermatology, 1998
- New Approaches to Reduce Staphylococcus Aureus Nosocomial Infection Rates: Treating S. Aureus Nasal CarriageAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 1998
- Topical antibiotics in the treatment of superficial skin infections in general practice—A comparison of mupirocin with sodium fusidateJournal of Infection, 1989
- A comparison of sodium fusidate ointment and mupirocin ointment in superficial skin sepsisCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 1988
- Epidermal Water-Barrier Formation After Stripping of Normal Skin*Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1965