Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Determinations in Breast Cancer—Technology, Biology and Clinical Significance

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Our present state of knowledge regarding estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR) has led to changes in treatment strategies: patients without receptors in their tumor tissues cannot be expected to respond to endocrine therapy. Furthermore, groups of patients with specifically good or poor prognoses can be selected. Treatment of the disease now approaches being of a rational rather than of an empirical nature. However, it is imperative that we achieve a considerably higher level of understanding before we can predict, with high probabilities, which patients will benefit from endocrine therapy. Only through a coordinated effort by many centers can we hope to attain this goal. In such collaborations there are several factors that must be taken into consideration if reproducible conclusions are to be reached: a) sampling of the tumor biopsy for analysis, b) potential differences in assay procedures which may affect results, and c) the composition of the population studied. Since the traditionally used ligand binding assay (dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) method) is highly sensitive even to slight modifications in assay procedure, intra- and interlaboratory standardization of receptor analyses is challenging. Accordingly, correlations between receptor status and/or concentrations and the clinical course of the disease from different centers often demonstrate discrepant results. With the greater reproducibility and sensitivity of the newly developed immunoenzymometric assay (IEMA) methods, many of these problems might be solved in the future and inter-center clinical studies will thus be facilitated. In the national Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) project, approximately 90% of all patients with primary breast cancer are registered. Estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PgR) determinations have been performed on tumor tissue from approximately 30% of these patients in one single laboratory. The results of these analyses are presented here for approximately 4,000 patients in relation to age, menopausal status, tumor size, grade of anaplasia, and lymph node involvement. Biologically and clinically there appear to be three fundamental types of tumor tissues; hormone responsive (ER+PgR+ and ER-PgR+), hormone non-responsive (ER-PgR-), and tissues of a more dubious hormone responsive nature (ER+PgR-), which occur predominantly among postmenopausal patients. Several lines of evidence indicate that among the postmenopausal patients there may be an estrogen binding molecule similar to but distinct from the normal, physiologically functioning ER molecule.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)