Evaluating mental health care reform: Including the clinician, client, and family perspective
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Mental Health Administration
- Vol. 21 (3) , 313-319
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02521337
Abstract
This article suggests one direction that theory building might take to develop a stronger conceptual foundation needed to test the effect on clients of reforms in the financing and organization of mental health care delivery systems. The authors recommend that health status outcomes be measured from three perspectives: the client, who can best report his or her own subjective experience of illness; the clinician, who is the best source of information about the client’s disease; and the family, which is the best source of information about the effects on members’ health status of caring for a mentally ill family member. The authors also recommend that measurement of health status should be multidimensional.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model Mental Health Benefit in Private Health InsuranceHealth Affairs, 1992
- The MOS social support surveySocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical careJAMA, 1989
- Health Perceptions of Primary Care Patients and the Influence on Health Care UtilizationMedical Care, 1989
- A quasi-experimental design based on regional variations: Discussion of a method for evaluating outcomes of medical practiceSocial Science & Medicine, 1989
- An investigation of the effect of regional variation in the treatment of hypertensionSocial Science & Medicine, 1989
- ARE HOSPITAL SERVICES RATIONED IN NEW HAVEN OR OVER-UTILISED IN BOSTON?The Lancet, 1987
- Ownership and Mental-Health ServicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Variations in Medical Care among Small AreasScientific American, 1982