Systematic Identification of Drugs That Cause Birth Defects — A New Opportunity
- 25 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (26) , 2556-2559
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb031395
Abstract
Patients, prescribers, and policymakers often assume that the most serious short-term adverse effects of a drug are identified in pre-marketing studies, so recognition of unexpected harm after widespread use raises concern about “failures of the system.” For drug-induced birth defects, however, the situation is reversed: the unfortunate reality is that we learn about virtually all teratogenic effects only after a drug has already received marketing approval, and of course, only after it has been used by pregnant women. Indeed, some teratogenic effects may be identified only after the drug has been in use for many decades. In these situations, the . . .Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maternal Medication Use and Risks of Gastroschisis and Small Intestinal AtresiaAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Postmarketing surveillance for human teratogenicity: A model approachTeratology, 2001
- Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitationsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2001
- The National Birth Defects Prevention StudyPublic Health Reports®, 2001
- Special Considerations in Studies of Drug‐induced Birth DefectsPublished by Wiley ,2000
- Spina Bifida in Infants of Women Treated with Carbamazepine during PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Retinoic Acid EmbryopathyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- MATERNAL VALPROIC ACID AND CONGENITAL NEURAL TUBE DEFECTSThe Lancet, 1982
- Birth defects related to bendectin use in pregnancy. I. Oral clefts and cardiac defectsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1981
- THALIDOMIDE AND CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIESThe Lancet, 1962