Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective: To monitor the conduct of medical research projects that have already been approved by the local medical research ethics committee. Design: Follow up study of ethically approved studies (randomly selected from all the studies approved in the previous year) by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview of the researchers at their workplace. Setting: Tayside, Scotland (mixed rural and urban population). Subjects: 30 research projects approved by Tayside local medical research ethics committee. Main outcome measures: Adherence to the agreed protocol, particularly for recruitment (obtaining and recording informed consent) and for specific requirements of the ethics committee, including notification of changes to the protocol and of adverse events. Results: In one project only oral consent had been obtained, and in a quarter of the studies one or more consent forms were incorrectly completed. Inadequate filing of case notes in five studies and of consent forms in six made them unavailable for scrutiny. Adverse events were reported, but there was a general failure to report the abandoning or non-starting of projects; in two studies the investigators failed to notify a change in the responsible researcher. Conclusions: Monitoring of medical research by local medical research ethics committees promotes and preserves ethical standards, protects subjects and researchers, discourages fraud, and has the support of investigators. We recommend that 10% of projects should undergo on-site review, with all others monitored by questionnaire. This would require about six person hours of time and a salary bill of c £120 per study monitored. Positive monitoring or audit of research projects by local medical research ethics committees is supported by medical researchers Ten per cent of projects should undergo on-site review All other projects should be monitored by questionnaire Patients should also complete a questionnaire