Writing Viewed by Disenfranchised Groups
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Written Communication
- Vol. 4 (3) , 299-309
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088387004003004
Abstract
Matched-pair samples (N= 174) of women and men faculty at doctoral-level universities and at traditionally women's colleges responded to a questionnaire in ways indicating (a) that at universities or colleges, women equal their male colleagues' time investments in writing and males' rates of publishing journal articles; (b) that at women's colleges, men and women devoted about half as much time to writing, devote about twice as much time to teaching, and publish articles at half the rate of their university counterparts; (c) and that, in either setting, women experience more discomfort about pressures to publish, feel more adversely affected by harsh reviewers, and report less confidence with their writing than do men, especially men at universities.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Academicians Don't WriteThe Journal of Higher Education, 1984
- Perception and practice of writing for publication by faculty at a doctoral-granting universityResearch in Higher Education, 1984
- Academics and their writingStudies in Higher Education, 1984
- Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professorsScientometrics, 1983
- A longitudinal study of the careers of a cohort of assistant professors in psychology.American Psychologist, 1982
- Pernicious publication practicesBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1981
- Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Publications of men and women psychologists: Do women publish less?American Psychologist, 1973