Penicillin G versus cefuroxime for prophylaxis in lower limb amputation
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Orthopaedica
- Vol. 58 (6) , 666-668
- https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678709146511
Abstract
Out of 457 patients amputated below or above the knee, we randomized 228 to receive penicillin G and 229 cefuroxime as prophylaxis against infection. We also stratified the patients into two groups: Group A (313 patients) who did not receive antibiotic treatment within 48 hours prior to the operation and Group B (88 patients) who did. There were 56 dropouts according to protocol regulations. The patients were evaluated for efficacy on the 21st postoperative day. In Group A, 20 of 158 (13 per cent) penicillin G-treated and 27 of 155 (17 per cent) cefuroxime-treated had wound sepsis; 5 (3 per cent) penicillin G-treated and 4 (3 per cent) cefuroxime-treated patients had been reampu-tated by Day 21 (P > 0.05). We concluded that prophylactic penicillin G prevents infection as effectively as cefuroxime after lower limb amputation.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prophylactic antibiotics in amputation of the lower extremity for ischemia. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial of cefoxitin.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1985
- Antibiotic prophylaxis in lower limb amputationActa Orthopaedica, 1985
- Postoperative Clostridial Infections in BritainBMJ, 1969
- PREVENTIVE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGERYBritish Medical Bulletin, 1960