A Randomized Study Comparing Platinum, Doxorubicin, and VP-16 With Platinum, 4′-Epidoxorubicin, and VP-16 in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 10 (3) , 245-248
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198706000-00017
Abstract
Forty-four previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated in a randomized trial comparing platinum (60 mg/m2), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2), and VP-16 (150 mg/m2) (PAV) with platinum (60 mg/m2), 4''-epidoxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and VP-16 (150 mg/m2) (PEV). The overall response rate was 10%. Major response rates were quite similar for the 21 patients treated with PAV (5%) and the 23 patients treated with PEV (18%) (p = 0.2). Of the 23 patients with assigned to PEV, two (9%) achieved complete responses for a median duration of 20 weeks and 44+ weeks. There was no significant difference (p = 0.75) in the median survival among patients treated with PAV (24 weeks) and those treated with PEV (20 weeks). Toxicity was generally mild and tolerable. The lack of response found in both arms of treatment casued the study to be terminated early. Some benefit could be appreciated in patients with limited disease and good Karnofsky performance status.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase II trial of epirubicin in advanced squamous, adeno- and large cell carcinoma of the lungEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide in bronchogenic squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. A study by the EORTC lung cancer working party (Belgium)Cancer, 1982