Echogenicity: analysis, significance, and masking
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 137 (3) , 471-476
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.137.3.471
Abstract
Echogenicity can be created by the admixture of any acoustically dissimilar substances. Experiments performed in vitro using mineral oil and water and in vivo examining 24 pathologically proven echogenic abnormalities show that echogenicity cannot be ascribed to a specific tissue, but rather is a property of all substances. In addition, when dissimilar histologic and pathologic substances have similar echo appearances and are adjacent, they become indistinguishable. This loss of structural definition can be termed the sonographic "masking sign," comparable in masking qualities to the established radiographic "silhouette sign." When this phenomenon occurs, an abnormality can be detected only through displacement of an organ or distortion of its internal anatomy. A thorough understanding of echogenicity and the sonographic masking sign will allow a more accurate evaluation of masses and infiltrating processes.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gray-scale sonographic spectrum of hypernephromas.Radiology, 1980
- Ultrasonic evaluation of normal pancreatic echogenicity and its relationship to fat deposition.Radiology, 1980
- Ultrasound findings in hepatitis.Radiology, 1980
- The Echographic Characteristics of Fatty Tissues and TumorsRadiology, 1978
- Gray Scale Ultrasound Evaluation of Hepatic Neoplasms: Patterns and CorrelationsRadiology, 1977
- Ultrasonic Characterization of Solid Renal Lesions: Echographic, Angiographic and Pathologic CorrelationRadiology, 1977