Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray‐scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography
Open Access
- 14 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 21 (3) , 277-282
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.62
Abstract
Objective To assess intraobserver and interobserver variability in ovarian volume and gray‐scale and color flow index measurements using transvaginal, three‐dimensional, power Doppler ultrasonography. Methods Eleven women (22 ovaries) were examined on day 8 of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation therapy, which was part of their in vitro fertilization treatment protocol. The patients were examined twice by the first observer and once by the second observer. The acquired volume datasets were analyzed using the VOCAL™ imaging program, enabling the assessment of ovarian volume, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), vascularization flow index (VFI) and mean grayness (MG). For these parameters the intraclass (intra‐CC) and interclass (inter‐CC) correlation coefficients, within‐observer and between‐observers repeatability coefficient (r) and limits of agreement were calculated. Results Both intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ovarian volume measurements were considered very good with an intra‐CC value of 1.00 and inter‐CC value of 0.99, respectively. Also VI, FI, VFI and MG measurements were repeatable by a single observer, the intra‐CC ranging from 0.82 to 0.91. The interobserver reproducibility was also good for VI, VFI and MG measurements (inter‐CC values 0.73, 0.70 and 0.81, respectively), but for FI measurements the reproducibility was poor (inter‐CC = 0.29, r = 7.87). Conclusions In general, the intraobserver reproducibility was better than interobserver reproducibility for all parameters. The volume assessments were reproducible both by one observer and by two separate observers. The intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were acceptable for VI, VFI and MG, whereas for FI the interobserver reproducibility was poor. Our results suggest that measurement of gray‐scale and color Doppler flow indices is reproducible thus allowing them to be used in clinical practice and research. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Community Programme ‘Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources’ (QLRI-CT-1999-51230)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducibility and repeatability of transabdominal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry between 10 and 14 weeks of gestationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three‐dimensional ultrasound imagingUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Three‐dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularizationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Association of endometrial blood flow as determined by a modified colour Doppler technique with subsequent outcome of in-vitro fertilizationHuman Reproduction, 1999
- Ovarian stromal echogenicity in women with clomiphene citrate–sensitive and clomiphene citrate–resistant polycystic ovary syndromeFertility and Sterility, 1999
- The assessment of ovarian tumor angiogenesis: what does three-dimensional power Doppler add?Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- The sensitivity of new color systems in blood-flow diagnosisSurgical Endoscopy, 1997
- Polycystic ovary syndrome--from gynaecological curiosity to multisystem endocrinopathyHuman Reproduction, 1996
- Influence of various instrument settings on the flow information derived from the power modeUltrasound in Medicine & Biology, 1991
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986