Genetic screening and ethnic minorities
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Critical Social Policy
- Vol. 19 (2) , 195-215
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839901900204
Abstract
No theory of ‘race’ and ethnicity is without serious practical drawbacks for effecting selective screening for haemoglobin disorders. Universal screening raises issues about consent, resources and eugenicist representation of impairment. The latter requires that people living with haemoglobin disorders and their counsellors should be central to education of practitioners in this area. Practitioners should link explanations of the haemoglobin disorders to explorations with the client of their perception of their ethnic identity. This should address the dangers of not informing clients of the tests; of not explaining to clients the nature and inheritance of haemoglobin disorders; and of not testing those who wish not to be tested. It should enable a record of ethnicity to be made which is tailored to the specific health purpose for which the information is sought.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetics and racismPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Human pedigree and the ‘best stock’: from eugenics to genetics?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- A critique of multiculturalism in health care: the challenge for nurse educationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1996
- IntroductionJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1996
- Researching black and minority ethnic groupsHealth Education Journal, 1995
- Psychosocial and clinical burden of thalassaemia intermedia and its implications for prenatal diagnosis.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1995
- Health and social servicesNew Community, 1992
- Children with genetic diseases: who should pay?The Lancet, 1992
- Genetics and public health.BMJ, 1992
- Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?The Lancet, 1991