Evaluating the human engineering of microprocessor-controlled operating room devices
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
- Vol. 7 (3) , 217-226
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01619263
Abstract
Although human engineering features are widely appreciated as a potential cause of operating room incidents, evaluating the human engineering features of devices is not widely understood. Standards, guidelines, laboratory and field testing, and engineering discipline are all proposed methods for improving the human engineering of devices. New microprocessor technology offers designers great flexibility in the design of devices, but this flexibility is often coupled with complexity and more elaborate user interaction. Guidelines and standards usually do not capture these features of new equipment, in part because technology improvements occur faster than meaningful guidelines can be developed. Professional human engineering of new devices relies on a broad, user-centered approach to design and evaluation. Used in the framework of current knowledge about human operator performance, these techniques offer guidance to new equipment designers and to purchasers and users of these devices.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human ErrorPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Standards Versus Guidelines for Designing User Interface SoftwarePublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Interface Metaphors and User Interface DesignPublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Guidelines for Designing User Interface SoftwarePublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1986
- Mode errors: a user-centred analysis and some preventative measures using keying-contingent soundInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1986
- Designing for ErrorPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1986
- An Analysis of Major Errors and Equipment Failures in Anesthesia ManagementAnesthesiology, 1984
- Toward Prevention of Anesthetic MishapsInternational Anesthesiology Clinics, 1984
- Design rules based on analyses of human errorCommunications of the ACM, 1983