Biocompatibility of Heparin‐Coated Membrane Oxygenator During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The biocompatibility of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit, in which an oxygenator is solely heparinized, was assessed by systemic inflammatory reactions as an indicator during CPB. Fourteen patients, 11 males and 3 females, underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 7 patients each. For the heparin–coated oxygenator group (Group H), a heparin–coated membrane oxygenator was used in the CPB circuit, and in the control (Group C) an uncoated membrane oxygenator was employed. Systemic inflammatory reactions, such as platelet activation, prostaglandin production, complement activation, and activated granulocyte released substance, were measured prior to, during, and 6 h after CPB. The number of platelets decreased after protamine administration in both groups (14. 5 ±4. 7 times 104/μl in Group H and 13. 8 ± 8. 7 times 104/μd in Group C) and returned to baseline levels in Group H while it remained decreased in Group C at 6 h after CPB. The platelet factor 4 level was significantly lower in Group H (181 ± 40 ng/ml) than in Group C (297 ±131 ng/ml) after protamine administration. Thromboxane–B2(TXB2) rose during CPB in both groups; however, there were significantly different levels of TXB2between the 2 groups at 60 min after CPB (293±258 pg/ml in Group H versus 408 ± 120 pg/ml in Group C) and after protamine administration (259 ± 122 pg/ml in Group H versus 709 ± 418 pg/ml in Group C). Plasma concentrations of granulocyte elastase were significantly lower in Group H at 30, 60 and 90 min, immediately after, and post–CPB than those of Group C. Although the oxygenator was solely heparinized in the CPB circuit, it was sufficiently effective to reduce inflammatory reactions during coronary artery bypass operation, and the heparin–coated surface seems to be more endothelium–like.