S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 2 (3) , 370-374
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210974
Abstract
Responses are faster with spatial S-R correspondence than with noncorrespondence (spatial compatibility effect), even if stimulus location is irrelevant (Simon effect). In two experiments, we sought to determine whether stimuli located above and below a fixation point are coded as left and right (and thus affect the selection of left and right responses) if the visual context suggests such a coding. So, stimuli appeared on the left or right eye of a face’s image that was tilted by 90° to one side or the other (Experiment 1) or varied between upright and 45° or 90° tilting (Experiment 2). Whether stimulus location was relevant (Experiment 1) or not (Experiment 2), responses were faster with correspondence of (face-based) stimulus location and (egocentrically defined) response location, even if stimulus and response locations varied on physically orthogonal dimensions. This suggests that object-based spatial stimulus codes are formed automatically and thus influence the speed of response selection.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affordances, codes, and decision processes: A response to Michaels (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994
- Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1993
- Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1993
- Persistence of stimulusesponse compatibility effects with extended practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992
- Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: The effects of hand position and posturePerception & Psychophysics, 1991
- Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibilityPsychological Research, 1991
- S–R Compatibilities Depend on Eccentricity of Responding HandThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1989
- Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984
- Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S compatibility effects?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984
- Donders' B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962