Durkheim’s Theory of Homicide and the Confusion of the Empirical Literature
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theoretical Criminology
- Vol. 8 (1) , 57-91
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604039741
Abstract
Emile Durkheim’s theory of the relationship between societal development and homicide has received significant attention in the empirical literature of criminology, yet has been oversimplified by this literature and appears to be poorly understood. The purpose of this article is to clarify the core arguments of his theory, note its complexity and highlight the extent to which Durkheim’s ideas on this subject have been misrepresented in empirical literature. In view of what Durkheim explicitly states about societal development and homicide, it is apparent that his theory has not been carefully tested. Distortions of his work have resulted both from the fragmented nature of his theoretical presentation and, perhaps more importantly, from the failure of contemporary researchers to read his work thoroughly.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modernization, age structure, and regional context: A cross‐national study of crimeSociological Spectrum, 1992
- Competing Perspectives on Cross-National Crime: An Evaluation of Theory and EvidenceThe Sociological Quarterly, 1988
- Durkheim and Individualism Revisited: Response to ChandlerSocial Forces, 1984
- Durkheim and Individualism: A Comment on MessnerSocial Forces, 1984
- Societal Development, Social Equality, and Homicide: A Cross-National Test of a Durkheimian ModelSocial Forces, 1982
- Population Heterogeneity and the Sociogenesis of HomicideSocial Forces, 1982
- Theory and Evidence of Rising Crime in the Nineteenth CenturyBritish Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Durkheim, Deviance and Development: Opportunities Lost and RegainedSocial Forces, 1981
- A Durkheimian Analysis of International Crime RatesSocial Forces, 1978
- Suicide, Homicide, and Economic DevelopmentSocial Forces, 1965