The influence of the location of load transfer on strains around implants supporting four unit cement‐retained fixed prostheses: in vitro evaluation of axial versus off‐set loading
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Vol. 29 (4) , 394-400
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00867.x
Abstract
Prudent control of the biomechanical load on dental implants is imperative to achieve long-term clinical success. The design of the final prosthesis and location of force transmission have a definitive influence on the quantification of induced strains and load partitioning among implants. While axial loading of implants generate an even distribution of stresses in the bone around implants, off-set loading, which is particularly observed in screw retained prosthesis increases the stresses at the bone-implant interface. This study evaluated the cervical strains on dental implants supporting four unit cement retained fixed prostheses under 50 N static axial and off-set loading conditions. As the type of strains are also dependent on the point of load transfer, design of the prosthesis and implant positioning, the study comprised the evaluation of induced strains through a simulation of five cement retained prosthetic options. The results revealed that off-set loading increases the magnitude of strains. However, it was not significant for all configurations (P < 0.05). This finding emphasizes the accompanying effect of implant location, angulation and macrogeometry of the prosthesis and, that the biomechanical evaluation of affecting factors is a multifaceted phenomenon.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous regionJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2000
- Finite element analysis of non‐axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dogJournal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1998
- The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructuresThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998
- Evaluating Parameters of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis—A Two-Dimensional Comparative Study Examining the Effects of Implant Diameter, Implant Shape, and Load DirectionJournal of Oral Implantology, 1998
- Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistryThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1997
- The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant. II: A morphometric evaluation after three months of loadingThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996
- Analysis of strain at selected bone sites of a cantilevered implant-supported prosthesisThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996
- Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial dentureThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996
- On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: A methodological and clinical studyClinical Oral Implants Research, 1996
- In vivo forces on endosteal implants: A measurement system and biomechanical considerationsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1984