Comparison of Acridine Orange, Acriflavine, and Bisbenzimide Stains for Enumeration of Bacteria in Clear and Humic Waters
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Vol. 51 (3) , 664-667
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.51.3.664-667.1986
Abstract
In highly humic water, acridine orange precipitated with dissolved humic matter, resulting in such bright background fluorescence that no bacteria could be seen. With bisbenzimide staining, a similar precipitate was nonfluorescent but obscured many cells. An acriflavine staining method proved useful and reproducible both in clear and in humic waters. Fading of fluorescence was not a problem, and stained samples could be stored after preparation. The fluorescence of cells stained with acriflavine was weaker than that with acridine orange, making counting extremely small cells slightly more difficult with the former stain.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Hoechst Dyes 33258 and 33342 for Enumeration of Attached and Planktonic BacteriaApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1982
- Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopyApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 1977
- An Investigation of Errors in Direct Counts of Aquatic Bacteria by Epifluorescence Microscopy, with Reference to a New Method for Dyeing Membrane FiltersJournal of Applied Bacteriology, 1975
- Chapter 12 Methods and Applications of Flow Systems for Analysis and Sorting of Mammalian CellsPublished by Elsevier ,1975