Response time and temporal order judgement in vision
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 36 (1) , 21-34
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538408255075
Abstract
Both response proportion and response time (RT) measures were obtained in a task requiring temporal order judgements (TOJ) of the illumination of two lights. The decrease in mean RT as the inter‐stimulus interval increased enabled the deterministic decision rule for TOJ to be rejected. Although the data were not inconsistent with a decision process incorporating a threshold for temporal resolution, a model based on a random walk process accounted for important features of the data. The implications of these results for the commonly employed “perceived‐order” method are discussed.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Memory for the order of sequential visual eventsAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1982
- A tandem random walk model for psychological discriminationBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1981
- Response latencies in the yes/no detection task: An assessment of two basic modelsPerception & Psychophysics, 1973
- Perceptual Indices of Performance: The Measurement of ‘Inspection Time’ and ‘Noise’ in the Visual SystemPerception, 1972
- The latencies of correct and incorrect responses in discrimination and detection tasks: Their interpretation in terms of a model based on simple countingPerception & Psychophysics, 1971
- Visual Latency as a Function of Stimulus Onset, Offset, and Background Luminance*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1971
- Effects of Changes in the Intensity of White Noise on Simultaneity Judgements and Simple Reaction TimeQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- Temporal Order Judgment and Reaction TimeScience, 1969
- Reaction-Time Distributions in the Detection of Weak Signals in NoiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965
- Prior Entry in the Auditory-Tactual ComplicationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1926