Misspecified regression model for the subdistribution hazard of a competing risk
- 5 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 26 (5) , 965-974
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2600
Abstract
We consider a competing risks setting, when evaluating the prognostic influence of an exposure on a specific cause of failure. Two main regression models are used in such analyses, the Cox cause‐specific proportional hazards model and the subdistribution proportional hazards model. They are exemplified in a real data example focusing on relapse‐free interval in acute leukaemia patients. We examine the properties of the estimator based on the latter model when the true model is the former. An explicit relationship between subdistribution hazards ratio and cause‐specific hazards ratio is derived, assuming a flexible parametric distribution for latent failure times. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modelling competing risks in cancer studiesStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- Testing treatment effects in the presence of competing risksStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Regression Modeling of Competing Risks Data Based on Pseudovalues of the Cumulative Incidence FunctionBiometrics, 2005
- Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 studyBlood, 2004
- A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing RiskJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Inference for Events with Dependent Risks in Multiple Endpoint StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1991
- A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing RiskThe Annals of Statistics, 1988
- Misspecified proportional hazard modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Effect of misspecification of regression models in the analysis of survival dataBiometrika, 1984