Why don't physicians test for HIV? A review of the US literature
- 31 July 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 21 (12) , 1617-1624
- https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e32823f91ff
Abstract
In its 2006 HIV testing guidelines, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine testing in all US medical settings. Given that many physicians do not routinely test for HIV, the objective of this study was to summarize our current understanding of why US physicians do not offer HIV testing. A comprehensive review of the published and unpublished literature on HIV testing barriers was conducted. A literature search was conducted in Pubmed using defined search terms. Other sources included Google, recent conference abstracts, and experts in the field. Studies were divided into three categories: prenatal; emergency department; and other medical settings. These categories were chosen because of differences in physician training, practice environment, and patient populations. Barriers identified in these sources were summarized separately for the three practice settings and compared. Forty-one barriers were identified from 17 reports. Twenty-four barriers were named in the prenatal setting, 20 in the emergency department setting, and 23 in other medical settings. Eight barriers were identified in all three categories: insufficient time; burdensome consent process; lack of knowledge/training; lack of patient acceptance; pretest counselling requirements; competing priorities; and inadequate reimbursement. US physicians experience many policy-based, logistical, and educational barriers to HIV testing. Although some barriers are exclusive to the practice setting studied, substantial overlap was found across practice settings. Some or all of these barriers must be addressed before the CDC recommendation for routine HIV testing can be realized in all US medical settings.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-Analysis of High-Risk Sexual Behavior in Persons Aware and Unaware They are Infected With HIV in the United StatesJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2005
- Disparity Between Pediatricians' Knowledge and Practices Regarding Perinatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Counseling and TestingPediatrics, 2003
- Survey of Physician Attitudes Toward HIV Testing in Pregnant Women in OhioAIDS Patient Care and STDs, 2003
- Late diagnosis of HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapyAIDS, 2002
- Evaluation of Initial CD4+T Cell Counts in Individuals with Newly Diagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection, by Sex and Race, in Urban SettingsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Promoting early HIV diagnosis and entry into careAIDS, 1999
- The maternal and child health sites' practices regarding HIV education, counseling, and testing of women of reproductive age in Chicago: barriers to universal implementation.Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1998
- The acceptability of voluntary HIV antibody testing in the United States: a decade of lessons learnedAIDS, 1996
- Physician attitudes toward human immunodeficiency virus testing in pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- HIV testing patterns: where, why, and when were persons with AIDS tested for HIV?AIDS, 1995