Time-temperature relationships for step-down heating in normal and thermotolerant cells
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Hyperthermia
- Vol. 10 (5) , 643-652
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02656739409022444
Abstract
Normal and thermotolerant H35 cells were submitted to step-down heating (SDH). SDH can significantly reduce the induction and expression of thermotolerance. For SDH a sensitizing treatment (ST) at 44 · 6°C was followed by a test treatment (TT) at a lower hyperthermic temperature. The comparison between the thermotolerant and non-thermotolerant condition was based on isosurvival ST doses. For both conditions dose-effect relationships were obtained by plotting the ST-surviving fraction against the D0 of a TT. The TT was at either 41 or 42–5°C, representing respectively, a permissive or a non-permisive condition for chronic induction of thermotolerance (CIT). The complex dose-effect relationships are partly exponential. In non-thermotolerant cells tested at 42–5°C the dose-effect relationship between ST and TT is relatively weak. At 41°C, however, the expression of CIT is strongly inhibited after a ST that kills < 20% of the cells. At higher ST doses the response is comparable with that at 42–5°C. In thermotolerant cells a high degree of thermosensitization is also observed for relatively low ST doses, but in contrast with non-thermotolerant cells a stronger dose-effect relationship remains at the higher ST doses. Ultimately this results in a comparatively higher degree of thermosensitization that can be achieved in non-thermotolerant cells. For example, at an isosurviving fraction of 0–15 the reduction of D0 in non-thermotolerant cells at 42 · 5°C is less than five times, whereas in thermotolerant cells, the D0 reduction is between 40 and 50 times. A similar reduction is found in non-thermotolerant cells tested at 41 °C. Subsequently, an isosurvival ST dose of about 40% was used in combination with a TT that was varied between 39 and 44°C. D0's were plotted in an Arrhenius diagram to obtain a time-temperature relationship for the effect of SDH on thermotolerant and non-thermotolerant cells. The four plots are all biphasic with a downward inflection. Thermotolerance causes an upward shift of the inflection point of 2°C relative to single-heated cells, whereas SDH causes a downward shift of 1 °C in single-heated cells and of 2°C in thermotolerant cells. For most of the temperature range, i.e. 39–43 · 5°C, SDH decreases the activation energies.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of chronically induced thermotolerance on thermosensitization in CHO cellsInternational Journal of Hyperthermia, 1991
- Effect of chronic thermotolerance on thermosensitization in Chinese hamster ovary cells studied at various temperaturesInternational Journal of Hyperthermia, 1991
- Step-down heating of CHO cells at 37.5–39° CInternational Journal of Hyperthermia, 1989
- Stability of heating temperature on cytotoxicityInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1987
- Protein synthesis, thermotolerance and step down heatingInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1985
- Thermotolerance and Thermosensitization in CHO and R1H Cells: A Comparative StudyInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1984
- Interaction of Thermotolerance and Thermosensitization Induced in CHO Cells by Combined Hyperthermic Treatments at 40 and 43°CRadiation Research, 1982
- Hyperthermia and CancerPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- Sensitization to Hyperthermia below 43° C Induced in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells by Step-Down Heating2JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1980
- Thermotolerance and sensitization induced in CHO cells by fractionated hyperthermic treatments at 38°–45°CPublished by Elsevier ,1979