Are patients who use alternative medicine dissatisfied with orthodox medicine?
- 1 May 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 142 (10) , 539-541
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1985.tb113486.x
Abstract
Approximately 45% of asthmatic families and 47% of non‐asthmatic families had consulted an alternative‐medicine practitioner at some time. The most popular form of alternative medicine was chiropractic (21.1% and 26.4%, respectively), followed by homoeopathy/naturopathy (18.8% and 12.7%, respectively), acupuncture (9.4% and 10.9%, respectively), and herbal medicine (4.7% and 6.4%, respectively), while the remainder (20.3% and 11.8% respectively) was distributed among iridology, osteopathy, hypnosis, faith healing and megavitamin therapy. More families were satisfied with orthodox medicine (87.1% and 93.6%, respectively) than with alternative medicine (84.2% and 75.1%, respectively). Crosstabulation analysis of pooled data both from asthma and from non‐asthma groups showed that 76.4% were satisfied both with orthodox and with alternative medicine, and 16.4% were satisfied with orthodox, but not with alternative, medicine. In contrast, only 2.7% were dissatisfied with orthodox medicine and satisfied with alternative medicine (χ2 = 9.33;P < 0.01). These findings do not support the view that patients who use alternative medicine are those who are disgruntled with orthodox medicine.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personal ViewBMJ, 1984
- ACUPUNCTURE AND THE AGE OF UNREASONThe Lancet, 1984
- Faith Healing, Christian Science, and the Medical Care of ChildrenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Nemesis or nuisance?The Medical Journal of Australia, 1983
- Megadose VitaminsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Young doctors' views on alternative medicine.BMJ, 1983
- Alternative medicine.BMJ, 1983
- CONTROLLED TRIAL OF HOMOEOPATHIC TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITISThe Lancet, 1983
- God and the DoctorNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The development of clinical science in Britain.BMJ, 1979