Comparison of two measuring methods for the evaluation of C-heterochromatin in human chromosomes
- 1 August 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Human Genetics
- Vol. 61 (1) , 68-70
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00291337
Abstract
In this study two different methods for evaluating the size of the C heterochromatin blocks of human chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y were compared. The first method measured the lengths of both the euchromatin and the C heterochromatin parts of the p and q arms of chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y. The second method analyzed the same chromosome segments, but by measuring the areas. In the comparison, the relative C heterochromatin value (length or surface) of each chromosome, the mean for each individual, the standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation were taken into account. It is proposed that the best estimation for the size of a C heterochromatin segment is the ratio of its length to the total length of the chromosome; accurate estimation requires at least 20 metaphases.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The quantitative analysis of polymorphism on human chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and YHuman Genetics, 1979
- C- and Q-band polymorphisms in the chromosomes of three human populationsAnnals of Human Genetics, 1976
- Chromosome polymorphism in a human newborn populationCytogenetic and Genome Research, 1975
- Human Q and C chromosomal variations: distribution and incidenceCytogenetic and Genome Research, 1975
- Polymorphism of human C-band heterochromatin. I. Frequency of variants.1973
- A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatinExperimental Cell Research, 1972
- Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral bloodExperimental Cell Research, 1960