Amborella not a “basal angiosperm”? Not so fast
Open Access
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- systematics
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 91 (6) , 997-1001
- https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.6.997
Abstract
The sequence of the plastid genome of Amborella trichopoda, the putative sister to all other extant angiosperms, was recently reported (Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1499–1505). Goremykin et al. used sequence data for 61 plastid genes from Amborella and 12 other embryophytes in phylogenetic analyses and concluded that Amborella is not the sister to the remaining flowering plants; the monocots instead occupy this position. The authors attributed their results, which differ substantially from all recent phylogenetic analyses of angiosperms, to the increased character sampling (30 017 nucleotides in their aligned matrix) in their analysis relative to published studies that included fewer genes but more taxa. We hypothesized that the difference in topology is not due to limited character sampling in previous studies but to limited taxon sampling in the analysis by Goremykin et al. To test this, we conducted a series of phylogenetic analyses using a three-gene, 12 (or more)-taxon data set to evaluate the topological effects of (i) including three vs. 61 genes for (nearly) the same set of taxa, (ii) analyzing different codon positions, (iii) substituting representatives of other basal lineages for Amborella, (iv) replacing the grasses used to represent the monocots with other monocots, selected either for their phylogenetic position or randomly, and (v) adding other basal taxa—Nymphaea, Austrobaileya, magnoliids, and monocots—to the 12-taxon data set. Our results demonstrate that the “monocots basal” topology obtained by Goremykin et al. is not due to increased character sampling of the plastid genome; their topology was obtained using only two plastid genes or two plastid genes and one nuclear gene. This topology was also retained when either Nymphaea or Austrobaileya was substituted for Amborella, demonstrating that any of the three basal lineages will attach to Calycanthus for lack of any other close branch. Furthermore, the “monocots basal” topology is not robust to changes in sampling of monocots. Simply adding Oncidium, for example, places Amborella sister to the other angiosperms. Thus, limited taxon sampling, focusing on organisms with complete genome sequences, can lead to artifactual results.Keywords
Funding Information
- Division of Environmental Biology (0090283)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noncoding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiospermsJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2003
- Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda Chloroplast Genome Sequence Suggests That Amborella Is Not a Basal AngiospermMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2003
- An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IIBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003
- Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogenyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
- Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiospermsAmerican Journal of Botany, 2000
- Taxonomic Sampling, Phylogenetic Accuracy, and Investigator BiasSystematic Biology, 1998
- Is It Better to Add Taxa or Characters to a Difficult Phylogenetic Problem?Systematic Biology, 1998
- Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
- Phylogenetics of Seed Plants: An Analysis of Nucleotide Sequences from the Plastid Gene rbcLAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1993
- Relative rates of nucleotide substitution at the rbcl locus of monocotyledonous plantsJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1992