Revisiting the Cochrane Collaboration
- 13 October 2001
- Vol. 323 (7317) , 821
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7317.821
Abstract
See also Papers p 829 > It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organised a critical summary, by specialty or subspecialty, updated periodically, of all relevant randomised controlled trials. > > Archie Cochrane, 19791 In 1992, Iain Chalmers and colleagues wrote an editorial in the BMJ that began with the above quotation and set out challenges foreseen at the time of the opening of what became the first Cochrane Centre, in Oxford.2 Some of these challenges have been met, some remain, and new ones have arisen as the centre which is now the Cochrane Collaboration strives to prepare and keep up to date systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions. At the time, the major hurdle facing reviewers was identifying relevant randomised trials, and the editorial described efforts to make the task easier. Nine years on, these efforts have contributed to the Cochrane controlled trials …Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Systematic Reviews and Registers of Ongoing Trials for Scientific and Ethical Trial Design, Monitoring, and ReportingPublished by Wiley ,2001
- Regular review: Effectiveness of interventions to help people stop smoking: findings from the Cochrane LibraryBMJ, 2000
- Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical JournalsJAMA, 1998
- Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda.BMJ, 1992