Comment on “Methane photooxidation in the atmosphere: Contrast between two methods of analysis” by Harold Johnston and Douglas Kinnison
- 20 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 105 (D1) , 1431-1433
- https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900464
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methane photooxidation in the atmosphere: Contrast between two methods of analysisJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998
- Evaluated Kinetic, Photochemical and Heterogeneous Data for Atmospheric Chemistry: Supplement V. IUPAC Subcommittee on Gas Kinetic Data Evaluation for Atmospheric ChemistryJournal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1997
- Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gasesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1995
- On the disproportionate role of tropospheric ozone as a filter against solar UV‐B radiationGeophysical Research Letters, 1989
- A discussion of the chemistry of some minor constituents in the stratosphere and tropospherePure and Applied Geophysics, 1973