Somatosensory evoked potentials sensitivity relative to electroencephalography for cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 23 (4) , 498-505
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.23.4.498
Abstract
The relation between electroencephalographic pattern changes and cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia is well established. Pattern changes seen on somatosensory evoked potentials under the same conditions are reported to be more sensitive indicators of cerebral ischemia. We estimated the sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory evoked potentials relative to electroencephalography for detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia. We simultaneously monitored electroencephalographs and somatosensory evoked potentials in 53 carotid endarterectomies performed on 51 patients under general anesthesia, and we determined the extent to which somatosensory evoked potentials detected cerebral ischemia defined by electroencephalographic pattern changes at the time of carotid cross-clamp. Twenty-three of the 53 cases studied had electroencephalographic evidence of ischemia following carotid cross-clamp. Ten of these 23 cases had an increased somatosensory evoked potential latency of 0.1 msec or greater (sensitivity 0.43). One of these 23 patients had a decrease in somatosensory evoked potential amplitude of 50% or greater (sensitivity 0.04). Of the 30 subjects who had no electroencephalographic evidence of ischemia, 13 had either no change or a decrease in somatosensory evoked potential latency (specificity 0.45). None of these 30 cases had a significant decrease in somatosensory evoked potential amplitude (specificity 1.0). If somatosensory evoked potential latencies were a sensitive method for detecting cerebral ischemia (true sensitivity of 0.95 or higher), the probability of only 10 subjects having somatosensory evoked potential latency increases would be less than 0.001. Therefore, our observed sensitivity cannot be attributed to chance. We conclude that measuring somatosensory evoked potentials is not a sensitive method for detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring Electrophysiologic Function during Carotid EndarterectomyAnesthesiology, 1991
- Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levelsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1987
- Response Variability of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials during Scoliosis SurgerySpine, 1987
- Somatosensory evoked potentials as a measure of experimental cerebral ischemiaJournal of Neurosurgery, 1985
- Intraoperative Detection of Cerebral Ischemia with Somatosensory Cortical Evoked Potentials during Carotid Endarterectomy - Presentation of a New MethodThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 1984
- Comparison of the Effects of Ischaemia on Early Components of the Somatosensory Evoked Potential in Brainstem, Thalamus, and Cerebral CortexJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1984
- Effect of stimulus intensity on short latency somatosensory evoked potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1979
- Investigation of brachial plexus traction lesions by peripheral and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1979
- The use of electroencephalographic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy, as an indicator for the application of a temporary by-passCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1969