BLEED
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 25 (7) , 1125-1132
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199707000-00011
Abstract
To develop an outcome prediction tool (BLEED: ongoing bleeding, low systolic blood pressure, elevated prothrombin time, erratic mental status, unstable comorbid disease) for clinical use in patients with either acute upper or acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. A cohort study. Barnes Hospital and Jewish Hospital, two private university-affiliated teaching hospitals in St. Louis, MO. Four hundred sixty-five patients with either acute upper or acute lower GI hemorrhage admitted from the emergency department. Admission of patients to the intensive care unit or hospital ward was determined by emergency department physicians, without use or knowledge of BLEED criteria. Patients meeting any BLEED criteria at their initial assessment in the emergency department were classified as "high-risk." All other patients were classified as "low-risk." The main outcome measure was the occurrence of an inhospital complication, defined as recurrent GI hemorrhage, surgery to control the source of hemorrhage, and hospital mortality. Patients classified as high-risk had significantly greater rates of inhospital complications at both Barnes Hospital (relative risk, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 4.44; p < .001) and Jewish Hospital (relative risk, 8.94; 95% confidence interval, 3.92 to 20.41; p < .001) compared with patients classified as low-risk. Patients classified as high-risk at either hospital were significantly more likely to develop additional organ system derangements, require a greater number of transfused units of packed red blood cells, and have longer hospital stays compared with patients classified as low-risk (p < .006). The BLEED classification also identified a greater frequency of intensive care admission for both low-risk (RR, 4.21; 95% Cl, 2.24 to 7.89) and high-risk (relative risk, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 2.02) patients at Barnes Hospital compared with those patients at Jewish Hospital, although no beneficial effects on patient outcome were reported. The BLEED classification, applied at initial emergency department evaluation and before admission, predicts hospital outcomes for patients with acute upper or lower GI hemorrhage. This outcome prediction tool also identified variations in intensive care utilization between two hospitals.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of intensive care unit utilization in Alberta and western MassachusettsCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Identification of Comatose Patients at High Risk for Death or Severe DisabilityJAMA, 1995
- Triage considerations for patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage admitted to a medical intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Risk Stratification in Unstable AnginaJAMA, 1995
- Evaluating Quality Performance in Alternate Health Care Delivery SystemsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Coverage and Access in Health Care ReformNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- The APACHE III Prognostic SystemChest, 1991
- Identification of Low-Risk Monitor Admissions to Medical-Surgical ICUsChest, 1987
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Medical Intensive Care: Indications, Interventions, and OutcomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980