Infectious Complications of Penile Prosthetic Implants
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 138 (1) , 65-67
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42991-0
Abstract
An infectious complication involving placement of a penile prosthesis is a diastrous event. A review of more than 300 devices placed between 1979 and 1984 at this center reveals an infectious complication rate of 8.3 per cent. Perioperative risk factors predisposing to infection included reoperation for technical failures, inadequate antibiotic coverage (specifically for Staphylococcus epidermidis), failure to perform a circumcision at the time of placement in uncircumcised patients and simultaneous placement with an artificial urinary sphincter device. No group of patients nor type of prosthesis was more susceptible to the development of a postoperative infection.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacterial Biofilm in Persistent Penile Prosthesis-Associated InfectionJournal of Urology, 1986
- Mucin Production by Staphylococcus epidermidisArchives of Surgery, 1986
- Aortofemoral Graft Infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidisArchives of Surgery, 1984
- Complications of Penile Prosthesis Surgery for ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1982
- A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of an infected endocardial pacemaker lead.Circulation, 1982
- Complications of inflatable penile prosthesesUrology, 1981
- Major complications of silicone penile prosthesis Predisposing clinical situationsUrology, 1980
- Complications of small-carrion penile prosthesisUrology, 1979
- Experience with Implantation of the Small-Carrion Penile Implant for Organic ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1976
- Prosthetic Valvular EndocarditisCirculation, 1973