Negotiating the Northern Ireland Problem: Track One or Track Two Diplomacy?
- 1 October 1990
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Government and Opposition
- Vol. 25 (4) , 403-418
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1990.tb00393.x
Abstract
THE RECENT POLITICAL HISTORY OF NORTHERN IRELAND HAS been punctuated by arrivals and departures as successive secretaries of state have attempted to impose their personalities on an intractable problem through a series of (failed) initiatives. The latest exercise has been under way since the beginning of 1990 and is closely identified with the diplomatic skills exerted by the present Secretary of State, Mr Peter Brooke. In what has been described as ‘potentially the most significant political discussions in all of Ireland since the treaty of 1921’, Mr Brooke has embarked on a voyage which could transcend in importance the Anglo-Irish Agreement of November 1985. The purpose of this article is to put that voyage into some sort of context by suggesting that rather than concentrate solely on the ‘high’ politics of political negotiation, attention needs to be paid to the mechanisms which allow negotiations to proceed. For that reason we will look at the relative merits — and the complementarity — of ‘Track One’ and ‘Track Two’ diplomacy.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Anglo-Irish AgreementForeign Affairs, 1986
- Queen's Rebels: Ulster Loyalism in Historical PerspectiveThe American Historical Review, 1979
- Political ViolenceNoûs, 1978
- Northern IrelandPublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1974
- Northern IrelandJournal of Contemporary History, 1971