Adenosine or dipyridamole: Which is preferred for myocardial perfusion imaging?
- 31 May 1991
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 17 (6) , 1295-1296
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80138-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac risk before elective vascular surgeryPublished by Elsevier ,2010
- Usefulness of semiquantitative analysis of dipyridamole-thallium-201 redistribution for improving risk stratification before vascular surgeryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise.Circulation, 1990
- Prognostic value of intravenous dipyridamole thallium imaging in patients with diabetes mellitus considered for renal transplantationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Prognostic utility of predischarge dipyridamole-thallium imaging compared to predischarge submaximal exercise electrocardiography and maximal exercise thallium imaging after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Usefulness of the severity and extent of reversible perfusion defects during thallium-dipyridamole imaging for cardiac risk assessment before noncardiac surgeryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Dipyridamole-Thallium Scanning in Patients Undergoing Vascular SurgeryJAMA, 1987
- The role of adenosine in the regulation of coronary blood flow.Circulation Research, 1980
- Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. III. Clinical trialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- Release of Adenosine by the Normal Myocardium in Dogs and Its Relationship to the Regulation of Coronary ResistanceCirculation Research, 1969