Treatment Implementation, Statistical Power, and Internal Validity
- 1 August 1983
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 7 (4) , 543-549
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8300700407
Abstract
Frequently program participants receive different levels of exposure to a given treatment. Cook and Poole (1982) recently argued that data on treatment implementation should be included in the analysis of treatment effects to increase power. It is argued that basing inferences about treatment effects on analyses including level of treatment implementa tion has a serious potential problem: Such an analysis is likely to result in biased estimates of treatment effects. Analyses including the level of treatment implementation must be interpreted cautiously unless the causes of differential exposure to the treatment are completely understood.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment Implementation and Statistical PowerEvaluation Review, 1982
- A Model for Assessing the Degree of Implementation in Field-based Educational ProgramsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
- Evaluating Program ImplementationEvaluation Review, 1980
- No Simple Answer: Critique of the Follow Through EvaluationHarvard Educational Review, 1978
- Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluations.Professional Psychology, 1977