Should verbal autopsy results for malaria be adjusted to improve validity?
Open Access
- 15 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 34 (3) , 712-713
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi087
Abstract
Sirs—Verbal autopsies performed in community settings are a key data source for determining probable causes of death in areas where vital registration data are unreliable.1, 2 However, validation studies of the verbal autopsy method in which verbal autopsy diagnoses are compared with ‘gold standard’ diagnoses (based on clinical and laboratory data) show that verbal autopsies have low sensitivity (range: 24–75%) and moderate specificity (range: 77–100%) for identifying deaths caused by malaria (i.e. verbal autopsies often miss true malaria deaths and misclassify non-malaria deaths as malaria).1, 3 –8Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of trends in childhood malaria mortality in Africa: an assessment of progress toward targets based on verbal autopsyThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Estimates of world-wide distribution of child deaths from acute respiratory infectionsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Effect of misclassification of causes of death in verbal autopsy: can it be adjusted?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Brief report. Validation study of a verbal autopsy method for causes of childhood mortality in NamibiaJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 1996
- The limitations of verbal autopsy in a malaria-endemic regionPaediatrics and International Child Health, 1994
- Childhood deaths in Africa: uses and limitations of verbal autopsiesThe Lancet, 1992
- The accuracy of the clinical histories given by mothers of seriously ill African childrenPaediatrics and International Child Health, 1987
- Impact on mortality and fertility of a community-based malaria control programme in Saradidi, KenyaPathogens and Global Health, 1987