Four Misconceptions About Language Proficiency in Bilingual Education
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in NABE Journal
- Vol. 5 (3) , 31-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1981.10668409
Abstract
This paper identifies four misconceptions about language proficiency which are currently impeding the implementation of effective bilingual education programs. These misconceptions involve: 1) the attribution of deficient language or cognitive skills on the basis of non-standard varieties of L1, and the consequent attempt to eradicate these stigmatized varieties; 2) the attribution of “English proficiency” to language minority students on the basis of adequate surface structure in “context-embedded” face-to-face communicative situations, with the result that low English academic performance in “context-reduced” communicative situations is attributed to deficient cognitive abilities; 3) the belief that L1 and L2 proficiencies are separate rather than manifestations of a common underlying proficiency; 4) the belief that a home-school language switch, or “linguistic mismatch”, is the major cause of language minority students’ academic failure.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Entry and Exit Fallacy in Bilingual EducationNABE Journal, 1980
- The Relative Proficiency of Limited English Proficient StudentsNABE Journal, 1980
- Linguistic behaviour and adjustment of immigrant children in French and English schools in MontrealApplied Psychology, 1980
- Describing Children's Linguistic Development at Home and at SchoolBritish Educational Research Journal, 1979
- The Critical Period for Language Acquisition: Evidence from Second Language LearningChild Development, 1978
- Labeling the Mentally RetardedPublished by University of California Press ,1973