Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual
Top Cited Papers
- 2 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 17 (4) , 571-582
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701329422
Abstract
Limits of agreement provide a straightforward and intuitive approach to agreement between different methods for measuring the same quantity. When pairs of observations using the two methods are independent, i.e., on different subjects, the calculations are very simple and straightforward. Some authors collect repeated data, either as repeated pairs of measurements on the same subject, whose true value of the measured quantity may be changing, or more than one measurement by one or both methods of an unchanging underlying quantity. In this paper we describe methods for analysing such clustered observations, both when the underlying quantity is assumed to be changing and when it is not.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999
- Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patientsCritical Care, 1997
- Lack of agreement between measurement of ejection fraction by impedance cardiography versus radionuclide ventriculographyCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Use of Urographic Contrast Media to Determine Glomerular Filtration Rate: Determining the Glomerular Filtration Rate of Each Kidney with Computed Tomography and ScintigraphyInvestigative Radiology, 1991
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983