Prediction of health professionals' intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice
Open Access
- 31 October 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 10 (4) , 364-379
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00465.x
Abstract
Objective To identify the determinants of the intention of physicians to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice.Background Screening for decisional conflict is one of the key competencies when educating health professionals about shared decision making. Theory‐based knowledge about variables predicting their intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice would help design effective implementation interventions in this area.Design Data of two cross‐sectional surveys embedded within a large implementation study of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) in primary care.Setting and participants In total, 122 health professionals from five family practice teaching units.Methods Intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice was defined as the intention to use the clinical version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) with patients at the end of the clinical encounter. It was assessed at the entry and the exit from this study. Both intentions were entered as a dependent variable in multivariate analyses.Main results At entry, the intention was influenced by: attitude (P < 0.001), subjective norm (P < 0.001), perceived behavioural control (P < 0.001) and clinical site (P < 0.05). On exit, it was influenced by: subjective norm (P < 0.001), perceived behavioural control (P < 0.001), clinical site (P < 0.05), international Continuing Medical Education (CME) (P < 0.05), other diplomas (P < 0.05) and intervention (P < 0.05). Inpost hocanalyses, there was a statistically significant difference between entry and exit in the impact of the level of exposure to the multifaceted implementation intervention on the intention (P = 0.003).Conclusions Variables predicting the intention of health professionals to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice using the DCS change over time suggesting that effective implementation interventions in this area will need to be modified longitudinally.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus processBMJ, 2006
- Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional ConflictMedical Decision Making, 2006
- Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Call Center Nurses' Decision Support for Callers Facing Values‐Sensitive Decisions: A Mixed Methods StudyWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2005
- Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice: barriers and opportunitiesHealth Expectations, 2000
- Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption BeliefsMIS Quarterly, 1999
- The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related BehaviorsAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 1996
- Health promotion in primary care: Physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medicationsSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Uncertainty and Professional Work: Perceptions of Physicians in Clinical PracticeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1992
- Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?JAMA, 1984
- Social processes in physicians' adoption of a new drugJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1959